This is the thing worth leaving the page with. Melanotan II acts across the melanocortin family rather than picking one receptor, and that breadth includes receptors involved in central sexual-function pathways. That is why its nearest relative in our catalog is PT-141, and why, if it ever belongs anywhere here, it belongs under mood and libido.
Melanotan I does not have that profile. Its comparative selectivity for MC1R keeps it close to skin biology and away from those central pathways. The names differ by a single numeral, which makes the two look like editions of one product. They are not. A provider evaluating a request for one is weighing a genuinely different set of questions than for the other.
The placement follows from the pharmacology. Melanotan I is filed under anti-aging and longevity with GHK-Cu, because both are studied in the context of skin and connective tissue rather than mood, metabolism, or muscle. That grouping is descriptive. It says which biology a compound engages; it is not a statement about appearance and it is not a claim about outcomes.